|
webhosting |
The
annual ritual: "Is this the year" praying beings?
Inter conquers the Evil Empire.
Tactics Talk
Inter's path to the Holy Grail? Drop Christian Vieri?
So no surprises in conjunction to the machinations of the last 2 months...
1. The end of Alberto Zaccheroni, allegedly forced to resign due to the inevitable arrival of one Roberto Mancini. One suspect this move was on the cards as early as the arrival of Giuseppe Favalli (or Dejan Stankovic if one wishes to go back even further). And no surprises at witnessing stories of more Lazio players suddenly being heavily linked to Inter, with Massimo Oddo, the Brazilian Cesar, to the phlegm spitting Sinisa Mihailovic.
2. A whole cluster of signings, a lot in comparison to the rest of Europe in this miserable market. Juan Seba Veron, Favalli, Estaban Cambiasso, Nicolas Burdisso, Edgar Davids and former Roma flop Lambros Choutos.
By the way, if the person
next to you suddenly exclaims "Heck, this is typical Inter, every season
a new bunch joins, and nothing changes. And it is not as if these are cast iron,
positive signings which the
fans crave anyway." Then the person next to you has a valid point. One
does not need to be a footballing
expert to realise this may be Veron and Davids' last shot at the big time, Cambiasso
has spent most of his
time bench warming whilst witnessing the Real Madrid freakshow, Favalli is no
more than a squad player,
Burdisso's unproven, and the less said about Choutos the better (and this comes
from the Greeks I've read
from).
So suddenly the future looks
less bright unlike the positives spouted from those stubborn romantics. But
surely there is something to look forward to, no?
Indeed, the spotlight, despite
the likes of Davids and Veron being colossus names, is firmly fixed on Mancio,
who less than two years ago was hailed as the saviour of Lazio, in instilling
that much needed unity,
stabilising the bunch of, at least at that time, 1st/2nd tier players whose
careers were on the ropes.
But more importantly in conjunction to Inter, providing that much needed sense
of footballing
identity to the side, playing an attractive and free flowing brand of football
that had the neutrals
salivating.
Inter, despite Zac's best
attempts at offensivefootball last season, was a team devoid of pattern in
their play, constantly disjointed, and unlike Cuper's Inter, could not grind
out results. But whilst Cuper
continued to stifle the ability of the likes of Alvaro Recoba, Mancini did wonders
to revitalise the form of
Claudio Lopez, "El Piojo" who looked more like a lost sheep during
his early spells, an impostor to the
speedster at Valencia. Mancini did much to aid his progress, and indeed past-it
dinosaurs such as
Fernando Couto and Mihailovic. But will he be the man too who liberates Recoba's
abilities to silence those
doubters? Let's all pray.
Of course, Chino is not
the only talented enigma who can do with Mancini's help. Veron, and the
consistently frustrating Andy van Der Meyde (if he doesn't get the boot) for
example, are equally in need
of inspiration.
Doing the double over one of your deadliest rivals should guarantee applauds. However, Inter’s stuttering and, at times, painful performances this season have overshadowed the two tremendous victories. In fact, one would counter that these two displays were the only games worthy of remembering when reflecting on another disappointing campaign, these were games where the result, and the performance, were compatible, both being positive.
Watching the game last Sunday in a bar in Brescia was a didactic experience. The atmosphere was, at least to my mind, somewhat subdued. This is thoroughly expected due to the underachievements of both parties concerned this term, notably Juve’s elimination from the Champions League and their ghastly first leg display in the Coppa Italia final, and of course, the reoccurring Inter “nothingness”, bar the UEFA Cup venture. However, unlike campaigns of the recent past, there was the simmering sense that Juve were there for the taking, that one would deem confidence in the camp to be high despite Inter’s domestic resurgence only recently commencing against Reggina, and the laughable jokeshop that is Ancona.
When the teamsheets were revealed, it was clear Inter would have the upper hand. First of all and needless to say, this was a Juve team minus Nedved, minus Del Piero, lacking dynamism and inspiration especially in offensive terms. This meant even our holding midfielders in Farinos and Cristiano Zanetti had the room to roam and pick out passes with ease since defensive priorities have fallen down the pecking order. The only hazard rooted from the rightwing menace of Camoranesi, and once more, one is convinced Kily does not hold the capacity to compete in the left wingback role, although his own goal was in no way his fault. Incidentally, Coco’s return is far too long overdue to the point of there being more questions than answers nowadays.
When Stankovic arrived in January various experts questioned what position the Serb would occupy in his new surroundings, yet few would have guessed the left forward role he occupied on Sunday night. In effect, Stankovic was given a quasi-free role, allowing to drop deeper to central positions in order to pick up possession. Contrary to the ratings after the game, Stankovic did not in fact have such a brilliant match (below par distribution) apart from his goal and the penalty, but this new found role was a potent indication of his patent versatility, and one suspects, spells even more ominous signs for Van der Meyde
In truth, the fact that Inter surrendered two soft goals should not overshadow the minimal threats posed by Juve during the entire evening. Excluding the spell after Kily’s own goal, Inter’s rearguard was rarely threatened, to the effect that it was difficult noticing Gamarra was actually on the pitch.
Overall, in accordance with Juve’s plain awfulness, Inter looked a revitalised pack of players who placed their testicles high on the line and scrambled. Whether Zac can harness the consistency required in domestic terms (unquestionably more paramount than progression in the UEFA Cup) to garner the remaining Champions League spot remains to be seen. But undoubtedly, the players are ready (most notably Almeyda’s rebuffing of his alleged retirement and Materazzi’s return), and one fully expect a win against Perugia on Sunday.
Wayne Wong
1. Inter’s midfield does not contribute enough to support our attack, this is at its most evident when Julio Cruz drops back into an attacking midfield position to pick up the ball and orchestrate the moves. This is often the problem with teams that employ the double pivot system of two holding midfielders, who are essentially ball winners solely (Arsenal with Gilberto and Vieira and Deportivo with Mauro Silva and Sergio for example), and in our case the choices of Almeyda, Cristiano Zanetti, Farinos plus Lamouchi. Putting it bluntly, the attacking thrust just doesn’t initiate. It seems Emre could have broken the trend by installing some much needed intelligent usage of possession, but the boy has been a letdown this term so far, and his sporadic adoption as left forward in our 3-4-3 simply does not work. Somehow we rely too heavily on Cruz as the origin of attack during possession play.
2. By and large, the wide men of the teams that employ a double pivot are the root of the majority of attacks, again, as in the case of Arsenal, with Pires and Ljunberg. With Inter’s 3-4-3 however, this does not materialise. This is simply because the two flank men, Javier Zanetti on the right, and the choices of Pasquale, Kily, Brechet and so forth shall often be preoccupied with defensive duties, which limits their function as offensive armaments. If and when they get pushed back during matches, this restricts enormously our room for roaming from those areas, where we will be left only with an attacking trident, more often than not isolated 40 yards down the other end of the pitch. On the contrary, if the two widemen push forward too far and we get hit on the counter, the chances are our centre backs either side of Adani, that is Cordoba and Cannavaro, will get dragged out of position to cover.
3. I am still a firm believer in Recoba’s possible positive role for
the side, despite the intermittent justified criticism showering from all corners
of his worth. Evidence so far has not been conclusive enough (primarily due
to injury) to suggest he’ll once again become the odd man out (like under
Cuper), or conversely be given a role as the man in the “hole”,
a position out of all our players this season, Cruz most closely resembles during
matches (see the recent Perugia and Dynamo matches for examples). This is not
to say though that it is imperative for Inter to acquire a fantasy player of
such type. And in actual fact, under Zac the creation of chances has not been
the biggest cause for concern, it is the putting away of them, cue the Parma
debacle last week. Our variation in terms of types of strikers we have is actually
very sufficient, like the usage of pace in Martins, power in Vieri, and the
methodical approach of Cruz are all positive signs. But above all, having chances
but not smacking the back of the net defeats their manifestation, hence the
talk of Adriano is fully warranted.
My anticipation at witnessing the Bologna versus Inter match on Sunday was further enhanced when the news broke of Christian Vieri’s omission from the starting lineup. As fellow observers from World Football Board and other forums can gather, I have long advocated the sparing usage of Bobo, with solely one reason. That Inter play better football, football that can hurt our grand rivals in head-to-head matches, minus Vieri.
When Inter outclassed Arsenal
at Highbury a few months ago, various journalists in the UK suggested that Inter
would have further demolished the Gunners had Vieri been on the pitch. This
issue is contentious, and to my mind, impertinent to our other offensive players,
such as Oba Martins and Julio Cruz, who got the job done without Vieri.
Fact, Christian Vieri is not the be all and end all for Inter, and clued-up
observers will realise the fact that Inter beat Juve on the own turf without
Vieri, and that, to me, underscores our destiny most potently.
Indeed, Vieri’s record at putting the ball in the back of the net is second
to none, not just in Italy, but also for Athletico Madrid. However, this record
has been relatively poor when put up against the big guns, since on the basis
of last season, versus our main rivals such as Juve and Milan and less so Lazio,
notwithstanding injuries, Vieri registered only one goal in the whole campaign
against Juventus in round 5. Furthermore, he has also failed to notch against
Roma and Milan this term.
A Vieri deficient Inter knocked the stuffing out of Juve and Bologna (at least for 3/4s of the match) with aggressive and incisive football. Gone is the moronic, Cuper style, pounding of the ball towards the man easiest to find who leads the line, as without Vieri, Inter find it easier to play balls into feet and space, keeping possession, and ultimately, adding more fluency to their game. There is still the temptation, although less so since the arrival of Zac, to knock it forward unconvincingly for Vieri to chase or flick the ball on to fellow attackers, yet evidence displayed by our convincing victories against Bologna and Juve, and the not so convincing win against Perugia (with Vieri starting), indicates a different way forward.
Our repertoire of gifted
ball players, such as Andy Van der Meyde, Cruz, and the sometimes forgotten
Alvaro Recoba, although none of them out and out strikers in the Vieri mould,
supplements the team’s buildup play much more convincingly than Vieri
does. Agreed, Inter would miss the hustle and bustle of Vieri’s overpowering
strength and athleticism, which comes in handy in destroying inferior opposition,
but in the long run, I am willing to sacrifice this for beating the big boys
in terms of head-to-heads, and in due course, playing attractive and match-winning
football.
Wayne Wong
BACK TO HOMEPAGE